top of page

SFDR 2025: What the New Consolidated Q&A Means for Financial Market Participants

  • Sergio Montebello
  • Aug 20
  • 2 min read

On 4th August 2025, the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published JC 2023 18, a fully consolidated Q&A on the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and its Delegated Regulation. Bringing together over 80 Q&As from both the European Commission and the ESAs, the document clarifies long-standing grey areas and sets a stricter tone on data, definitions, and disclosures.


This isn’t just guidance—it’s a compliance roadmap.


  1. Scope: No More Exceptions


The Q&A confirms that sub-threshold AIFMs and non-EU AIFMs are fully within the scope of SFDR if they market funds in the EU. This includes the requirement to set up a website to host Article 10 product disclosures—no exemptions apply. Delegation to third parties does not remove the responsibility from the licensed firm.


  1. Sustainable Investment: Freedom with Strings


SFDR allows firms to define what qualifies as a “sustainable investment” under Article 2(17), but they must clearly disclose:

  • How the investment contributes to environmental or social objectives,

  • How it passes the “do no significant harm” (DNSH) test, and

  • That the investee follows good governance.

Relying solely on a transition plan is not enough. Importantly, firms must apply their definition consistently across all products.


  1. Principal Adverse Impacts (PAI): Data Accuracy Matters


New technical clarifications include:

  • “Current value” for calculations must reflect enterprise value without deducting cash.

  • Short positions can be netted, but must not result in negative values.

  • Firms are encouraged to show the percentage of PAI indicators based on estimated vs. reported data.

Entities with ≥500 employees must report PAI impacts at group level, including global subsidiaries.


  1. Product-Level Disclosures Tightened


For Article 8 and 9 products:

  • Designated indices must not be broad-market benchmarks.

  • Managers must explain any mismatch in reported sustainable investment percentages.

  • Liquidity and hedging allocations are allowed but must be justified.


  1. Methodology and Data: Show Your Working


While the ESAs still allow methodological flexibility, the expectations are clear: every assumption, data source, and calculation must be transparent and auditable. Disclosures must be updated at least quarterly, using the most recent available data.


In Summary


The consolidated Q&A raises the bar for SFDR compliance:

  • Exemptions are disappearing.

  • Transparency and consistency are non-negotiable.

  • Data quality is the new differentiator.


Firms should act now: review disclosures, align delegated managers, and prepare to defend their assumptions. The era of principles-based disclosure without evidence is over.




Get in Touch:



Matthew Aquilina

maquilina@quazar.mt / +356 2388 4600


ree

bottom of page