SFDR 2025: What the New Consolidated Q&A Means for Financial Market Participants
- Sergio Montebello
- Aug 20
- 2 min read
On 4th August 2025, the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published JC 2023 18, a fully consolidated Q&A on the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and its Delegated Regulation. Bringing together over 80 Q&As from both the European Commission and the ESAs, the document clarifies long-standing grey areas and sets a stricter tone on data, definitions, and disclosures.
This isn’t just guidance—it’s a compliance roadmap.
Scope: No More Exceptions
The Q&A confirms that sub-threshold AIFMs and non-EU AIFMs are fully within the scope of SFDR if they market funds in the EU. This includes the requirement to set up a website to host Article 10 product disclosures—no exemptions apply. Delegation to third parties does not remove the responsibility from the licensed firm.
Sustainable Investment: Freedom with Strings
SFDR allows firms to define what qualifies as a “sustainable investment” under Article 2(17), but they must clearly disclose:
How the investment contributes to environmental or social objectives,
How it passes the “do no significant harm” (DNSH) test, and
That the investee follows good governance.
Relying solely on a transition plan is not enough. Importantly, firms must apply their definition consistently across all products.
Principal Adverse Impacts (PAI): Data Accuracy Matters
New technical clarifications include:
“Current value” for calculations must reflect enterprise value without deducting cash.
Short positions can be netted, but must not result in negative values.
Firms are encouraged to show the percentage of PAI indicators based on estimated vs. reported data.
Entities with ≥500 employees must report PAI impacts at group level, including global subsidiaries.
Product-Level Disclosures Tightened
For Article 8 and 9 products:
Designated indices must not be broad-market benchmarks.
Managers must explain any mismatch in reported sustainable investment percentages.
Liquidity and hedging allocations are allowed but must be justified.
Methodology and Data: Show Your Working
While the ESAs still allow methodological flexibility, the expectations are clear: every assumption, data source, and calculation must be transparent and auditable. Disclosures must be updated at least quarterly, using the most recent available data.
In Summary
The consolidated Q&A raises the bar for SFDR compliance:
Exemptions are disappearing.
Transparency and consistency are non-negotiable.
Data quality is the new differentiator.
Firms should act now: review disclosures, align delegated managers, and prepare to defend their assumptions. The era of principles-based disclosure without evidence is over.
Get in Touch:
Matthew Aquilina
maquilina@quazar.mt / +356 2388 4600
